The Project Background
A residential client needed engineering guidance related to termite-related structural damage at a property in Des Moines, Iowa. The source materials described concerns in the floor framing visible from the basement as well as more substantial framing concerns in detached garage and shed areas.
The project involved more than a single isolated observation. StructSolve reviewed multiple areas, documented findings with photographs, identified framing members that warranted repair, and later reviewed repair work after corrective work had been performed.
Source Materials Reviewed
The case study package was based on an initial termite damage assessment and two follow-up repair review documents. Together, the documents created a public-safe project story about structural evaluation, repair recommendations, and later review of completed repair work.
The initial assessment noted that accessible basement areas did not show significant structural damage, while the garage and shed framing included several members that had been weakened by termite activity. Follow-up documentation then addressed repair progress and, in the final review, documented that necessary repairs had been completed for the house, garage, and shed.
StructSolve’s Role
StructSolve’s role was to provide structural engineering documentation rather than a general home inspection or design package. The evaluation focused on visible framing conditions, including floor framing, wall framing, sill plates, studs, headers, rafters, and other affected wood members.
The initial report distinguished between areas that appeared adequately repaired and areas where repair was still needed. For the garage and shed, StructSolve identified specific categories of damaged framing members and outlined repair expectations, including replacement of affected members, temporary support during replacement, and incremental repair sequencing to help maintain support during the work.
Key Engineering Considerations
The garage and shed framing required closer attention because the observed damage was more substantial than the conditions documented in the accessible portions of the home. The initial report identified damaged members along multiple garage walls and in the shed area, including sill plates, studs, posts, headers, rafters, and other framing components.
During a follow-up repair review, StructSolve documented several corrections that were still needed before the repair work could be considered complete. The notes included concerns related to lumber in contact with concrete, framing members not bearing properly between plates, a pinched wire condition at new studs, an unreplaced sill plate area, and rafter repair details that needed additional correction.
These observations gave the project team a clearer path for finishing the repair work. Rather than providing a broad or generic recommendation, the documentation identified the framing conditions that needed attention and helped clarify where additional work was still required.
Deliverables
StructSolve provided report-style engineering documentation for the project. The source package included an initial structural assessment with supporting photographs and repair recommendations, followed by repair review summaries that documented the status of the work after repairs were performed.
The deliverables helped distinguish between the house framing, which was documented as adequately repaired in the initial assessment, and the garage and shed framing, which required additional repair and follow-up review.
Outcome
The final follow-up review documented that the necessary repairs had been completed for the house, garage, and shed. For a public case study, the outcome should be stated carefully: StructSolve’s documentation helped clarify observed termite-related structural conditions, recommended repair needs, and the later status of the repair work based on follow-up review.
The resulting record gave the client and project team engineering documentation to support next steps and confirm the source-documented repair review findings without exposing private property details.
Project Photos
Selected project photos are reviewed before publication and shown only when they do not expose private identifying details.



